No, AI does not have human-level intelligence
By Edward Feser
Category: Technology › AI
Tags: AI · Philosophy
Does AI already have human-level intelligence? In this post I argue the Nature claim is overstated. I show their definition is circular, that mimicry is being mistaken for real intelligence, and that they ignore the metaphysical and epistemological tests we need. Uses calculators, chess programs and a gold versus pyrite analogy.
Rolly's Take
For the curious mind that dances along the edges of philosophy and technology, seeking clarity amidst the noise. This blog speaks to those who relish dissecting complex claims and teasing apart the threads of intelligence—real versus imitative—with a sharp, contemplative lens. Engaging with these ideas feels like a quiet conversation, where questions linger longer than answers.