No, AI does not have human-level intelligence

Does AI already have human-level intelligence? In this post I argue the Nature claim is overstated. I show their definition is circular, that mimicry is being mistaken for real intelligence, and that they ignore the metaphysical and epistemological tests we need. Uses calculators, chess programs and a gold versus pyrite analogy.

Read this blog

Rolly's Take

This blog resonates with those who find themselves pondering the deeper implications of intelligence and the limits of artificial constructs. It speaks to the curious mind that enjoys untangling philosophical threads, digging beneath surface-level assertions about technology's capabilities. Here, the exploration of definitions and distinctions invites readers to reflect on what it truly means to think and know, encouraging a critical perspective often overlooked in mainstream discussions. It's a haven for the intellectually adventurous, the kind of person who relishes in the nuances of argument and the art of careful reasoning.