Aggregating abstaining experts

By M-Phi

Category: Mind & IdeasPhilosophy

Tags: Research · Theory · Philosophy

Can you aggregate expert credences when some experts abstain on certain propositions? I explain the coherent approximation principle CAP and the principle of minimal mutilation, show how squared Euclidean distance SED gives straight linear pools while Kullback Leibler yields geometric pools, and use an Amira and Benito example to expose CAP's shortcoming with missing propositions and suggest possi

Read this blog

Rolly's Take

This blog speaks to the intellectually curious, those who find beauty in the nuances of belief and conviction. It captivates minds that thrive on the complexities of thought, seeking not just answers, but deeper principles that govern how we understand and reconcile differing perspectives. For the kind of person who delights in the delicate interplay of logic and abstraction, this exploration unravels the intricate dance of expert credences and invites reflection on coherence and divergence in ways that challenge conventional wisdom. Here, the pursuit of clarity amidst uncertainty unfolds quietly, beckoning you to consider what it truly means to aggregate knowledge.